問(wèn)題已解決

老師這個(gè)題怎么做?。?/p>

84785042| 提問(wèn)時(shí)間:2020 12/17 15:11
溫馨提示:如果以上題目與您遇到的情況不符,可直接提問(wèn),隨時(shí)問(wèn)隨時(shí)答
速問(wèn)速答
CMA徐老師
金牌答疑老師
職稱:中級(jí)會(huì)計(jì)師,USCPA,CMA
老師這個(gè)題怎么做啊? a. The amount of bad debt experience is calculated as below: ($900,000-$150,000)*3%=$22,500 b. Dr. Bad Debt Allowance $10,000 Cr. Account Receivable $10,000 c. The allowance for doubtful accounts $22,500-$10,000=$12,500 d. Account Receivable balance=$900,000-$150,000-$675,000-$10,000=$65,000 e. I think bad debt allowance is a very subjective issue. The reasonableness depends on a variety of subjects. From the context of this quest, I think it is reasonnable. Because actual bad debt incurred is only $10,000, which is only 1.33% of all credit sales, lower than the 3% benchmark. This means the 3% benchmark is conservative enough. I hope this helps.
2020 12/18 11:02
CMA徐老師
2020 12/18 11:02
老師這個(gè)題怎么做??? a. The amount of bad debt experience is calculated as below: ($900,000-$150,000)*3%=$22,500 b. Dr. Bad Debt Allowance $10,000 Cr. Account Receivable $10,000 c. The allowance for doubtful accounts $22,500-$10,000=$12,500 d. Account Receivable balance=$900,000-$150,000-$675,000-$10,000=$65,000 e. I think bad debt allowance is a very subjective issue. The reasonableness depends on a variety of subjects. From the context of this quest, I think it is reasonnable. Because actual bad debt incurred is only $10,000, which is only 1.33% of all credit sales, lower than the 3% benchmark. This means the 3% benchmark is conservative enough. I hope this helps.
描述你的問(wèn)題,直接向老師提問(wèn)
0/400
      提交問(wèn)題

      您有一張限時(shí)會(huì)員卡待領(lǐng)取

      00:10:00

      免費(fèi)領(lǐng)取
      Hi,您好,我是基于人工智能技術(shù)的智能答疑助手,如果有什么問(wèn)題可以直接問(wèn)我呦~